Please note that this is just a preview of a school assignment

 posted on our website by one of our clients. 

If you need assistance with this question too, 

scroll to the bottom of this post or CLICK HERE to Order Now

Reading Research Literature

Guidelines and Grading Rubric – Week 5

Purpose

The student will read research
literature to determine the research purpose, question, design, population, sample,
limitations, data collection and analysis.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following
course outcomes:

CO
2: Apply research principles to the
interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO #4 and 8)

CO
4: Evaluate published nursing research
for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO #4
and 8)

Points:This assignment
isworth 225
points.

Due Date:Submit to the Reading Research Literature basket in the
Dropbox by11:59
p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.

Requirements

1.
Download the research articles from
the Chamberlain library.

Retrieve
the following research articles:Make
sure you are viewing the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format,
you may not be able to see the tables and figures that are referenced in the
questions.

Velayutham, S. G., Chandra, S. R.,
Bharath, S., & Shankar, R. G. (2017). Quantitative balance and gait
measurement in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases: A
pilot study. Indian Journal of
Psychological Medicine, 39(2), 176-182. 203132.
doi:10.4103/0253-7176.203132. Retrieved from.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122248443&site=eds-live&scope=site”>http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122248443&site=eds-live&scope=site

Pals, R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen,
C. B., Hansen, C. S., Jørgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., & Willaing, I.
(2015). Making sense of a new technology in clinical practice: A qualitative
study of patient and physician perspectives. BMC Health Services Research,
15(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1. Retrieved from.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live”>http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live

2.
Download the NR439_Reading_Research_Literature_form.

3.
Watch the video on how to complete
this assignment at.brainshark.com/devry/vu?pi=zGCzbNjK4zHr05z0″>http://www.brainshark.com/devry/vu?pi=zGCzbNjK4zHr05z0.

4.
Type answers to the questions
directly onto the form. Your form does NOT need to follow APA formatting;
however, you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write
in complete sentences.

5.
Save the file by clicking Save as
and adding your last name, e.g., NR439_W5_Reading_Research_Literature_Form_Smith.docx.

6.
Submit to the Week 5 Reading
Research Literature basket in the Dropbox by11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of
Week 5. Please post questions about this paper
in the Week 5 Q & A Forum.

Grading Criteria

Reading Research Literature – Week 5

Type your answers to the following
questions using complete sentences and correct grammar, spelling, and syntax. Click
Save as and save the file with your last name and assignment, e.g.,NR439_Reading_Research_Literature_Smith.
Submit by11:59 pm MT Sunday at the end of Week
5.
The guidelines and grading rubric for this assignment may be found on the
assignment page.

Title: RRL

Name:
[replace this text with your name]

The following questions pertain to:

Velayutham, S. G., Chandra,
S. R., Bharath, S., & Shankar, R. G. (2017). Quantitative balance and gait
measurement in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases: A
pilot study. Indian Journal of
Psychological Medicine, 39(2), 176-182. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.203132

.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122248443&site=eds-live&scope=site”>http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122248443&site=eds-live&scope=site

1)
What
is the purpose of this research?

2)
What
is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.

3)
Give
a complete description of the research design of this study.

4)
What
is the population (sample) for this study.

5)
Was
the sample approach adequate for the research design that was selected and
explain why.

6)
Describe
the data collection procedure.

7)
How
were the data analyzed after collection?

8)
Discuss
the limitations found in the study.

9)
Discuss
the authors’ conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions are based on the data
that they collected?

10)
How does this advance knowledge in the field?

The following questions pertain to:

Pals, R. S., Hansen, U. M.,
Johansen, C. B., Hansen, C. S., Jørgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., &
Willaing, I. (2015). Making sense of a new technology in clinical practice: a
qualitative study of patient and physician perspectives. BMC Health Services
Research, 15(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1

.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live”>http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live

11)What is the purpose of this
research?

12)
What
is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.

13)Give a complete description
of the research design of this study.

14)What is the population
(sample) for this study?

15)
Was
the sample spproach adequate for the research design that was selected and
explain why.

16) Describe the data collection procedure.

17)How were the data analyzed?

18)Discuss the limitations
found in the study?

19)Discuss the authors’
conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions are based on the data that they
collected?

20)How does this advance knowledge in the field.